<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ongoings</title>
	<link>http://fettig.net/weblog/2004/11/03/ongoings/</link>
	<description>The latest on Abe's work</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Shand</title>
		<link>http://fettig.net/weblog/2004/11/03/ongoings/#comment-517</link>
		<author>Adam Shand</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fettig.net/weblog/2004/11/03/ongoings/#comment-517</guid>
		<description>I've never seen this message before but I'd assume it's referring to the protocol iTunes uses to control an AirportExpress.

Adam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never seen this message before but I&#8217;d assume it&#8217;s referring to the protocol iTunes uses to control an AirportExpress.</p>
<p>Adam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jip</title>
		<link>http://fettig.net/weblog/2004/11/03/ongoings/#comment-518</link>
		<author>Jip</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fettig.net/weblog/2004/11/03/ongoings/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>"This will prevent... AirTunes remote control"? Does anybody know what that means?

I think it means that you cannot control your AirTunes device remotely with iTunes if the port is blocked.
Not an actual remote, but controlling the AirTunes with iTunes.

Jip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This will prevent&#8230; AirTunes remote control&#8221;? Does anybody know what that means?</p>
<p>I think it means that you cannot control your AirTunes device remotely with iTunes if the port is blocked.<br />
Not an actual remote, but controlling the AirTunes with iTunes.</p>
<p>Jip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kalsey</title>
		<link>http://fettig.net/weblog/2004/11/03/ongoings/#comment-519</link>
		<author>Adam Kalsey</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fettig.net/weblog/2004/11/03/ongoings/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Spammers suck. I've had the same problem many times. What was worse, though, was when a spammer's typo resulted in the inclusion of one of my domains in his spam: &lt;a href="http://kalsey.com/2004/06/spam_fallout/"&gt;http://kalsey.com/2004/06/spam_fallout/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spammers suck. I&#8217;ve had the same problem many times. What was worse, though, was when a spammer&#8217;s typo resulted in the inclusion of one of my domains in his spam: <a href="http://kalsey.com/2004/06/spam_fallout/">http://kalsey.com/2004/06/spam_fallout/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abe</title>
		<link>http://fettig.net/weblog/2004/11/03/ongoings/#comment-520</link>
		<author>Abe</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fettig.net/weblog/2004/11/03/ongoings/#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Adam S. and Jip - 

I hear you on the AirTunes thing.  It could very well be that it's simply talking about communicating with an AirPort Express. But don't you think "AirTunes remote control" would be a strange way to express that?

Maybe somebody with an Airport Express could verify this - if you block port 3869, can you still stream music to the AirPort Express?  If you can, this message is talking about something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam S. and Jip - </p>
<p>I hear you on the AirTunes thing.  It could very well be that it&#8217;s simply talking about communicating with an AirPort Express. But don&#8217;t you think &#8220;AirTunes remote control&#8221; would be a strange way to express that?</p>
<p>Maybe somebody with an Airport Express could verify this - if you block port 3869, can you still stream music to the AirPort Express?  If you can, this message is talking about something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abe</title>
		<link>http://fettig.net/weblog/2004/11/03/ongoings/#comment-521</link>
		<author>Abe</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fettig.net/weblog/2004/11/03/ongoings/#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Adam K. - 

Yeah, that is worse. That must have been so frustrating!

The good news in this case is that my stream of bouncebacks seems to be tapering off - I've only had 20 or so today.  But I know it's probably just a matter of time before it happens again.

I'm looking forward to seeing SPF, or something, catch on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam K. - </p>
<p>Yeah, that is worse. That must have been so frustrating!</p>
<p>The good news in this case is that my stream of bouncebacks seems to be tapering off - I&#8217;ve only had 20 or so today.  But I know it&#8217;s probably just a matter of time before it happens again.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing SPF, or something, catch on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
